Sanakirja
Tekoälykääntäjä

Synonyymit

Ääntäminen

  • ÄäntäminenUS:
    • IPA: [ˈɑɹgjumənt]
  • UK:
    • IPA: /ˈɑːɡjʊmənt/
  • US:
    • IPA: /ˈɑɹɡjʊmənt/
    • IPA: /ˈɑɹɡjumənt/
    • IPA: /ˈɑɹɡjəmənt/
  • Tuntematon aksentti:
    • IPA: /ˈɑː(ɹ)gjʊmənt/
KäännösKonteksti
Substantiivit
1.
2.
дискусия {f} (diskusija)
3.
спор {m} (spor)
4.
аргумент {m} (argumént)
matematiikka, ohjelmointi

Määritelmät

Substantiivit

  1. A fact or statement used to support a proposition; reason
  2. dispute; a quarrel.
  3. process of reasoning.
  4. (philosophy, logic)series of propositions organized so that the final proposition is a conclusion which is intended to follow logically from the preceding propositions, which function as premises.
  5. (mathematics) The independent variable of a function.
  6. (programming) A valuefunction.
  7. (programming) A parameteractual parameter, as opposed to a formal parameter.
  8. (linguistics) Any of the phrases that bears a syntactic connection to the verb of a clause.
  9. (astronomy) The quantity on which another quantity in a table depends.
  10. The subject matter of a discourse, writing, or artistic representation; theme or topic; also, an abstract or summary, as of the contents of a book, chapter, poem.
  11. Matter for question; business in hand.

Esimerkit

  • There is [...] no more palpable and convincing argument of the existence of a Deity.
  • The argument is not about things, but names.
  • Consider the argument:    15) I am hungry; therefore I am hungry. Intuitively this should count as valid. But suppose we thought of the components of arguments as sentences, and suppose we imagine the context shifting between the utterance of the premise and the utterance of the conclusion. Suppose you are hungry and utter the premise, and I am not hungry and utter the conclusion. Then we would have a true premise and a false conclusion, so the argument would not be valid. Clearly we need to avoid such problems, and introducing the notion of a proposition, in the style of this section, is one way of doing so.
  • In ‘The Critic of Arguments’ (1892), Peirce adopts a notion that is even closer to that of a propositional function. There he develops the concept of the ‘rhema’. He says the rhema is like a relative term, but it is not a term. It contains a copula, that is, when joined to the correct number of arguments it produces an assertion. For example, ‘__ is bought by __ from __ for __’ is a four-place rhema. Applying it to four objects a, b, c, and d produces the assertion that a is bought by b from c for d (ibid. 420).
  • Parameters are like labeled fillable blanks used to define a function whereas arguments are passed to a function when calling it, filling in those blanks.
  • In numerous works over the past two decades, beginning with the pioneering work of Gruber (1965), Fillmore (1968a), and Jackendoff (1972), it has been argued that each Argument (i.e. Subject or Complement) of a Predicate bears a particular thematic role (alias theta-role, or θ-role to its Predicate), and that the set of thematic functions which Arguments can fulfil are drawn from a highly restricted, finite, universal set.
  • The altitude is the argument of the refraction.
  • You and love are still my argument.
  • the abstract or argument of the piece
  • [shields] with boastful argument portrayed
  • Sheathed their swords for lack of argument.

Taivutusmuodot

Monikkoarguments

Luokat