Sanakirja
Tekoälykääntäjä

Vaihtoehtoiset kirjoitusmuodot

KäännösKonteksti
Verbit
1.logiikka, retoriikka
2.logiikka, retoriikka

Määritelmät

Verbit

  1. (idiomatic) To pick out the best or most desirable items from a list or group, especially to obtain some advantage or to present something in the best possible light.
  2. (rhetoric, logic) To select only evidence which supports an argument, and reject or ignore contradictory evidence.
  3. (US, idiomatic, sports) To position oneself near the opponent's goal to attempt to receive an errant or intentional pass for an easy score, as in basketball or versions of soccer where offsides are not enforced.

Esimerkit

  • From all the available statistics, the politician cherry-picked only those that backed up his ideas.
  • Those stations that will send CNN tapes of their local and regional news for CNN to cherry-pick from, in turn will be allowed to cherry-pick themselves.
  • Screeners can help you cherry-pick a promising group of stocks that meet your exact specifications.
  • "We're not offering you a chance to cherry-pick the Caerphilly Zoo to fill in the gaps in your own collection.
  • In time The Simpsons would, indeed, resort to spoofing such decidedly non-spooktacular fare like E.T and Mr. And Mrs. Smith (both in “Treehouse Of Horror XVIII”) but in 1992 the field was wide-open and the show could cherry-pick the most iconic and beloved fright fare of all time.
  • The reason for this concentration is to attempt to alleviate the problems of fragmentation which usually accompany the study of retailing, particularly at the end of the early period, and has so often happened in the past, to curtail the temptation to 'cherry-pick' the best evidence from a wide, but not necessarily related, area.
  • You are *asking* for a specific *subset* of the data to *prove* a specific theory. That is 'cherry picking'. It is no more valid to 'cherry pick' data to disprove global warming than it is to 'cherry pick' data to prove it. That is *science*. You *must* deal with the entire data set. What part of this is not clear?
  • Yes, I do think in principle is is a good idea to have clearing houses where data is assessed and has as objective an account as possible given of the data because of the tendency of all organisations to cherry-pick those studies which may support a pre-existing position.
  • So it's possible to 'cherry pick' only the evidence that supports a position and ignore the rest. To the reader who does not know about the rest of the evidence, it may seem like a strong case. The whole body of evidence must be considered.

Taivutusmuodot

Partisiipin perfekticherry-picked
Imperfekticherry-picked
Partisiipin preesenscherry-picking
Yksikön kolmannen persoonan indikatiivin preesenscherry-picks